响应“碳责任-价格”双重信号的冰蓄冷系统日前调度方法

张鹏勃; 吕石磊; 贾艳冰; 王冉; 吴至复

doi:10.12465/issn.0253-4339.20260804004

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

响应“碳责任-价格”双重信号的冰蓄冷系统日前调度方法

XXXX | 更新时间：2026-09-24

- 响应“碳责任-价格”双重信号的冰蓄冷系统日前调度方法
- Day-Ahead Flexible Dispatch Method for Ice Thermal Storage Systems in Response to Dual Signals of Carbon and Price
- 制冷学报 2026年页码：1-10
- 作者机构：
  
  1.天津大学环境科学与工程学院天津 300350
  2. 国网浙江省电力有限公司杭州 310007
- 作者简介：
  
  吕石磊，男，教授，天津大学环境科学与工程学院，18602214455，E-mail：lvshilei@tju.edu.cn。研究方向：建筑热/冷能与电能储存、城市柔性能源。
- 基金信息：
  
  国家重点研发计划(2023YFC3807100)
- DOI：10.12465/issn.0253-4339.20260804004
  中图分类号： TB61⁺1;TU831.3
- 收稿：2026-08-04，
  
  修回：2026-08-11，
  
  录用：2026-08-21，
  
  网络首发：2026-09-24，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张鹏勃，吕石磊，贾艳冰，等. 响应“碳责任-价格”双重信号的冰蓄冷系统日前调度方法［J］. 制冷学报，XXXX，XX（XX）：1-10.

Zhang Pengbo，Lü Shilei，Jia Yanbing，et al. Day-Ahead Flexible Dispatch Method for Ice Thermal Storage Systems in Response to Dual Signals of Carbon and Price［J］. Journal of Refrigeration，XXXX，XX（XX）：1-10.
张鹏勃，吕石磊，贾艳冰，等. 响应“碳责任-价格”双重信号的冰蓄冷系统日前调度方法［J］. 制冷学报，XXXX，XX（XX）：1-10. DOI： 10.12465/issn.0253-4339.20260804004.

Zhang Pengbo，Lü Shilei，Jia Yanbing，et al. Day-Ahead Flexible Dispatch Method for Ice Thermal Storage Systems in Response to Dual Signals of Carbon and Price［J］. Journal of Refrigeration，XXXX，XX（XX）：1-10. DOI： 10.12465/issn.0253-4339.20260804004.

摘要

电力动态碳排放责任因子（

）具有显著时变特征，其与固定时段分时电价的时序错位可能导致冰蓄冷系统经济与低碳调度目标冲突。针对该问题，本文提出一种响应“碳责任-价格”双重信号的冰蓄冷系统日前调度方法。构建计及系统运行收益与碳减排量的多目标优化模型，针对4类典型

场景生成Pareto非支配方案集，并采用熵权-优劣解距离法进行方案评价与经济偏好系数优选。杭州某园区案例

表明：4类

场景优选经济偏好系数分别为0.27、0.20、0.22和0.40。与低碳策略相比，多目标优选策略在保留93.9%~98.3%碳减排效益的同时，使运行收益提高12.7%~107.7%；与经济策略相比，实现了87.7%~95.8%的碳排放责任改善潜力。所提方法可适应“碳-价”的时序错位特征，实现冰蓄冷系统经济与低碳效益的协调。

Abstract

Objective

The dynamic carbon emission responsibility factor of electricity （

） varies considerably over time because of changes in the power generation mix， system load， and unit operational conditions. Its temporal profile might not coincide with the time-of-use electricity prices defined by fixed periods. As a result， low-price periods are not necessarily the same as low-carbon periods， which might create the conflicts between the economic and low-carbon operation of ice thermal storage systems. This study aims to develop a day-ahead dispatch method that can respond simultaneously to the carbon-responsibility and electricity-price signals. The method is designed to coordinate the operational revenue and carbon-reduction performance under different temporal relationships between the two signals.

Methods

An equivalent charging and discharging power model was firstly developed to elucidate the influence of ice storage operation on the user-side electricity demand. The model considers the charging state of the ice storage tank， the operational characteristics of the dual-mode chiller， and auxiliary equipment power consumption. A linear programming model of multi-objective day-ahead mixed-integer was then established. The two objectives were the incremental electricity cost and incremental carbon emission responsibility caused by the ice storage operation. An economic preference coefficient was introduced to balance the normalized economic and low-carbon objectives. A total of 100 preference coefficients ranging from pure low-carbon strategy to pure economic strategy were evaluated for each

scenario. After the duplicate and dominated solutio

ns were removed， the Pareto non-dominated solution sets were obtained. Operational revenue， carbon emission responsibility， and low-carbon matching degree were selected as the performance indicators. The entropy-weighted technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution （TOPSIS） was used to evaluate the Pareto solutions and determine the preferred economic preference coefficient. A case study was conducted for an industrial park in Hangzhou using the 2024 time-of-use electricity price and four typical

profiles， i.e.， an overall high-carbon profile， a low-carbon low-variation profile， a single-peak profile， and a double-peak profile.

Results and Discussion

The entropy weights and the preferred economic preference coefficient varied markedly with the temporal characteristics of Cr. For Cr1， the weights of carbon emission responsibility and low-carbon matching degree are 0.40 and 0.36， respectively. Regarding Cr3， where high-Cr periods clearly overlap with the midday low-price period， the low-carbon matching degree receives the highest weight of 0.47. The preferred economic preference coefficients for Cr1-Cr4 are 0.27， 0.20， 0.22， and 0.40， with the recommended ranges of 0.15-0.47， 0.08-0.30， 0.14-0.43， and 0.24-0.47， respectively. Dispatch results further show that the economic strategy tends to charge during the low-price but high-Cr periods in Cr1 and Cr3， whereas the preferred multi-objective strategy shifts charging away from these periods. Compared with the low-carbon strategy， operational revenue are increased by 78.5%， 12.7%， 107.7%， and 14.7% for Cr1-Cr4， while 93.9%-98.3% of the carbon-reduction benefit is retained. The carbon-responsibility improvement potential relative to the economic strategy reaches 87.7%-95.8%， with the low-carbon matching degrees of -0.79 to -0.91.

Conclusions

The proposed day-ahead dispatch method can effectively coordinate the economic and low-carbon operation of ice thermal storage systems under the temporally mismatched carbon and price signals. The four Cr scenarios require different economic preference coefficients， namely， 0.27， 0.20， 0.22， and 0.40， confirming that a fixed preference setting cannot adequately represent different carbon-price coupling conditions. Relative to the low-carbon strategy， the preferred multi-objective strategy retains 93.9%-98.3% of the carbon-reduction benefit while increasing the operational revenue by 12.7%-107.7%. Relative to the economic strategy， it achieves 87.7%-95.8% of the available improvement in the carbon emission responsibility. These results demonstrate that scenario-adaptive preference selection can suppress the high-carbon charging induced by low electricity prices and provide a practical basis for the coordinated carbon-energy interaction on the demand side.

关键词

Keywords

references

Tang Hong ， Wang Shengwei ， Li Hangxin . Flexibility categorization， sources， capabilities and technologies for energy-flexible and grid-responsive buildings： State-of-the-art and future perspective ［J］. Energy ， 2021 ， 219 ： 119598 .

毛宇波，梁彩华，汤琪 . 中央空调系统的自蓄能特性与调峰潜力［J］. 制冷学报， 2024 ， 45 （ 6 ）： 135 - 144 .

Mao Yubo ， Liang Caihua ， Tang Qi . Self-storage characteristics and peak shaving potential of central air conditioning systems ［J］. Journal of Refrigeration ， 2024 ， 45 （ 6 ）： 135 - 144 .

Rahgozar S ， Pourrajabian A ， Dehghan M . On the role of building use and operational strategy in integrating ice storage systems： an economic perspective ［J］. Journal of Energy Storage ， 2024 ， 98 ： 113025 .

赵柏扬，张雪芬，李勇，等 . 基于动态规划的光伏蓄冰空调预测控制［J］. 制冷学报， 2020 ， 41 （ 4 ）： 8 - 15 .

Zhao Bai ， BoYang ， Zhang Xuefen ， et al . Predictive control of photovoltaic ice storage air-conditioning system based on dynamic programming ［J］. Journal of Refrigeration ， 2020 ， 41 （ 4 ）： 8 - 15 .

Kang Xuyuan ， Wang Xiao ， An Jingjing ， et al . A novel approach of day-ahead cooling load prediction and optimal control for ice-based thermal energy storage （TES） system in commercial buildings ［J］. Energy and Buildings ， 2022 ， 275 ： 112478 .

Tang Hao ， Yu Juan ， Geng Yang ， et al . Optimization of operational strategy for ice thermal energy storage in a district cooling system based on model predictive control ［J］. Journal of Energy Storage ， 2023 ， 62 ： 106872 .

Zhao Jing ， Liu Dehan ， Yuan Xiulian ， et al . Model predictive control for the ice-storage air-conditioning system coupled with multi-objective optimization ［J］. Applied Thermal Engineering ， 2024 ， 243 ： 122595 .

Wang Xiao ， Kang Xuyuan ， An Jingjing ， et al . Reinforcement learning approach for optimal control of ice-based thermal energy storage （TES） systems in commercial buildings ［J］. Energy and Buildings ， 2023 ， 301 ： 113696 .

Yan Xiuying ， Men Qi ， Meng Qinglong ， et al . Dual-stage collaborative optimal allocation of cooling source in ice storage air-conditioning systems considering daily and emergency demand response ［J］. Energy and Buildings ， 2025 ， 347 ： 116247 .

Fleschutz M ， Bohlayer M ， Braun M ， et al . The effect of price-based demand response on carbon emissions in European electricity markets： The importance of adequate carbon prices ［J］. Applied Energy ， 2021 ， 295 ： 117040 .

Aryai V ， Goldsworthy M . Controlling electricity storage to balance electricity costs and greenhouse gas emissions in buildings ［J］. Energy Informatics ， 2022 ， 5 （ 1 ）： 11 .

江亿，张吉，张涛，等 . 电力动态碳排放责任因子［J］. 中国电机工程学报， 2024 ， 44 （ 17 ）： 7024 - 7038 .

Jiang Yi ， Zhang Ji ， Zhang Tao ， et al . Dynamic carbon emission responsibility factor of electricity ［J］. Proceedings of the CSEE ， 2024 ， 44 （ 17 ）： 7024 - 7038 .

Koebrich S ， Cofield J ， McCormick G ， et al . Towards objective evaluation of the accuracy of marginal emissions factors ［J］. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews ， 2025 ， 215 ： 115508 .

刘昱良，李姚旺，周春雷，等 . 电力系统碳排放计量与分析方法综述［J］. 中国电机工程学报， 2024 ， 44 （ 6 ）： 2220 - 2235 .

Liu Yuliang ， Li Yaowang ， Zhou Chunlei ， et al . Overview of carbon measurement and analysis methods in power systems ［J］. Proceedings of the CSEE ， 2024 ， 44 （ 6 ）： 2220 - 2235 .

Elio J ， Milcarek R J . Multi-objective electricity cost and indirect CO 2 emissions minimization in commercial and industrial buildings utilizing stand-alone battery energy storage systems ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production ， 2023 ， 417 ： 137987 .

Zhang Hanbei ， Xiao Fu ， Zhang Chong ， et al . A multi-agent system based coordinated multi-objective optimal load scheduling strategy using marginal emission factors for building cluster demand response ［J］. Energy and Buildings ， 2023 ， 281 ： 112765 .

Yu M G ， Huang Bowen ， Ma Xu ， et al . Multi-objective sizing and dispatch for building thermal and battery storage towards economic and environmental synergy ［J］. Applied Energy ， 2024 ， 372 ： 123819 .

Guittet D ， Bonnema E ， Mitchell M ， et al . Ice storage model-predictive control in an office building with PV： scenario， error and sensitivity analysis ［J］. Energy and Buildings ， 2025 ， 341 ： 115828 .

Chen Qi ， Kuang Zhonghong ， Liu Xiaohua ， et al . Optimal sizing and techno-economic analysis of the hybrid PV-battery-cooling storage system for commercial buildings in China ［J］. Applied Energy ， 2024 ， 355 ： 122231 .

Wang Xiaoyun ， Yang Hua ， Yao Sheng ， et al . Thermo-economic optimization of a building system integrating envelope and energy supply equipment for the rural residence ［J］. Applied Thermal Engineering ， 2025 ， 278 ： 127386 .

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

数据中心冷却与余热回收协同性能优化及不确定性分析

射流冲击冷却热力-水力性能多目标优化研究

带反向凸起凹坑的平板通道空气传热与压降特性的多目标优化

内肋扭曲椭圆管内超临界CO2对流传热强化及多目标优化研究

除湿转轮的三维动态仿真与设计优化