Cite this article
  •    [Click To Copy]
  •    [Click To Copy]
【Print This Page】 【Download PDF Full Text】 View/Add CommentDownload reader Close

←Previous Article|Next Article→

Back Issue    Advanced Search

This Article Has Been:Browse 1575 Times   Download 2045 Times QR code information in this article
Scan Up The Code!
电动汽车热泵空调系统低温制热性能及优化
李万勇1, 刘雨声1, 施骏业1, 陈江平1, 郭贞军2, 王大健2
0
(1.上海交通大学制冷与低温工程研究所;2.南京协众汽车空调集团有限公司)
摘要:
热泵空调系统在满足电动汽车冬季供暖需求方面发挥了重要作用。本文采用新型低GWP值的R1234yf为制冷剂?对电动汽车热泵空调系统在-20~7 ℃环境下的低温制热性能进行了测试?对电动汽车冬季热负荷进行标定,并且与制冷剂R134a进行了对比,研究了系统制冷剂充注量、制热量、COP和排气温度的变化,同时对系统各部件火用损失进行了分析计算并根据结果 确定系统优化方向。结果表明:该系统最佳制冷剂充注量为1406g,制热量与COP在大部分工况下达到2kW与18以上,能够满足低温制热需求;R1234yf 直接替代R134a时,系统制热量与COP比R134a系统低71%与66%,系统的排气温度比R134a平均低53 ℃,系统工作更稳定可靠;热泵空调系统内冷凝器与压缩机的火用损失占系统总火用损的80%以上,是重点优化方向;增大内部冷凝器换热面积、增大风量、提高压缩机转速可显著提升R1234yf系统制热性能,使之与R134a系统的制热性能相比大约相等或者更高。
关键词:  电动汽车  热泵  R134yf  系统性能  火用分析
DOI:
Received:March 12, 2020Revised:June 14, 2020
基金项目:
Low-temperature Heating Performance and Optimization of Electric Vehicle Heat Pump Air-conditioning System
Li Wanyong1, Liu Yusheng1, Shi Junye1, Chen Jiangping1, Guo Zhenjun2, Wang Dajian2
(1.Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics,Shanghai Jiao Tong University;2.Nanjing Xiezhong Auto-airconditioner(group) Co.,Ltd.)
Abstract:
Heat pump air-conditioning systems play an important role in meeting the winter heating needs of electric vehicles. In this study, the new refrigerant R1234yf, which has a low GWP value, was used for the working medium. The low-temperature heating performance of the electric vehicle heat pump air-conditioning system was tested at ?20 ℃ to 7 ℃. The winter heat load of the electric vehicle was calibrated. The refrigerant charge amount, heating performance, COP, and discharge temperature of the system were studied and compared with those of refrigerant R134a. Exergy loss of system components was analyzed, and the system was also optimized. The results show that the optimal refrigerant charge amount of the system was 1551 g, and the heating capacity and COP reached greater than 2 kW and 1.8, respectively, under most working conditions, which could meet the needs of heating at low temperatures. When directly substituted, the heating capacity and COP of the system were 7.1% and 6.6% lower than that of the R134a system. The discharge temperature of the R1234yf heat pump system is 5.3 ℃lower than that of R134a, which could make the system more stable and reliable. The exergy loss of the inner condenser and compressor accounts for more than 80% of the total exergy loss of the system, which is the key optimization parameter for heat pump air conditioning. Increasing the heat transfer area of the inner condenser, increasing the air volume, and improving the compressor speed can significantly improve the heating performance of the system, making it basically equal to or even better than the R134a system.
Key words:  electric vehicle  heat pump  R1234yf  system performance  exengy loss analysis

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫