采用三换热器和四通阀的两种车用热泵系统的对比研究

王颖; 施骏业; 陈江平; 王鑫楠; 康志军

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4339.2014.01.071

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

采用三换热器和四通阀的两种车用热泵系统的对比研究

更新时间：2024-07-18

- 采用三换热器和四通阀的两种车用热泵系统的对比研究
- Comparative Study of Two Kinds of Automotive Air Conditioning System with Three Heat Exchangers and Four-way Valve
- 制冷学报 2014年35卷第1期
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 上海交通大学机械与动力工程学院
  2. 浙江盾安人工环境股份有限公司
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.3969/j.issn.0253-4339.2014.01.071
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2014
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王颖, 施骏业, 陈江平, 等. 采用三换热器和四通阀的两种车用热泵系统的对比研究[J]. 制冷学报, 2014,35(1).

Wang Ying, Shi Junye, Chen Jiangping, et al. Comparative Study of Two Kinds of Automotive Air Conditioning System with Three Heat Exchangers and Four-way Valve[J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2014, 35(1).
王颖, 施骏业, 陈江平, 等. 采用三换热器和四通阀的两种车用热泵系统的对比研究[J]. 制冷学报, 2014,35(1). DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4339.2014.01.071.

Wang Ying, Shi Junye, Chen Jiangping, et al. Comparative Study of Two Kinds of Automotive Air Conditioning System with Three Heat Exchangers and Four-way Valve[J]. Journal of Refrigeration, 2014, 35(1). DOI： 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4339.2014.01.071.

摘要

电动汽车没有足够的余热可供冬季取暖，因此将热泵引进电动车具有重要意义。文章对两种汽车热泵系统：三换热器与四通阀的热泵系统进行了分析研究。测试结果表明：在大部分工况下，两个系统的能力相近，只相差10~50W，但四通阀系统的COP要比三换热器系统高7%~15%，压缩机功率则比三换热器系统低50~150W。

Abstract

Electric vehicles don’t have enough waste heat for heating in winter

so the introduction of heat pump system to electric vehicles is of great significance. Two kinds of heat pump system with three heat exchangers and four-way valve are researched in the article

and the result shows that: in most conditions

the two systems’ ability are similar

the difference between them is only 10W to 50W

but the COP of four-way valve system is 15% ~ 18% higher than that of three heat exchanger system

and the compressor power of four-way valve system is 50 to 150W lower than that of three heat exchanger system.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

2253

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

带有经济器空气源热泵在超低温环境下制热运行实验研究

高温压缩机变转速的复叠式热泵系统性能实验研究