Comparative Study on the Performance of R404A Commercial Refrigerator Retrofitted with R290 and R454C
Journal of RefrigerationVol. 45, Issue 4, Pages: 36-42(2024)
作者机构:
1..上海理工大学能源与动力工程学院 上海 200093
2..上海金城制冷设备有限公司 上海 201805
作者简介:
Tian Yafen, female, associate professor, School of Energy and Power Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 86-13062642019, E-mail:yftian_usst@qq.com. Research fields: compressor optimization, refrigeration and heat pump system research.
基金信息:
the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52206016)
Wang Zebin, Xue Wen, Li Mengjia, et al. Comparative Study on the Performance of R404A Commercial Refrigerator Retrofitted with R290 and R454C[J]. Journal of refrigeration, 2024, 45(4): 36-42.
DOI:
Wang Zebin, Xue Wen, Li Mengjia, et al. Comparative Study on the Performance of R404A Commercial Refrigerator Retrofitted with R290 and R454C[J]. Journal of refrigeration, 2024, 45(4): 36-42. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4339.2024.04.036.
Comparative Study on the Performance of R404A Commercial Refrigerator Retrofitted with R290 and R454C
R404A is widely used in light commercial equipment. However
the Kigali Amendment currently specifies the refrigerant replacement process. R454C and R290
owing to their low global warming potential values
have become promising refrigerants for use in commercial refrigerators. To compare the performances of these three refrigerants in commercial refrigerators
this study uses a climatic chamber to test four commercial refrigerators of different sizes. Four key parameters
namely the refrigerant charge
energy consumption
material cost
and carbon emissions
of the R404A
R454C
and R290 systems were compared. The results indicated that replacing R404A with R454C resulted in energy savings of approximately 5% and a reduction of approximately 15% in carbon emissions. When using R290
the charge was only 20.6%-34.3% of that of R404A
remaining within a safe range. Additionally
the charging cost was only half that of R404A. Furthermore
the system satisfied the performance requirements with this charge amount
leading to a reduction in energy consumption and carbon emissions within the ranges of 15%-35% and 25.3%-43.7%