引用本文:[点击复制]
[点击复制]
【打印本页】 【在线阅读全文】【下载PDF全文】 查看/发表评论下载PDF阅读器关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1286次   下载 1285 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
喷雾量对移动空调冷凝器喷雾冷却性能的影响
张业强,李康利,焦向志,胡根,刘金平,秦小丁,金听祥
0
(郑州轻工业大学能源与动力工程学院;广东志高空调有限公司;华南理工大学电力学院)
摘要:
本文在熔差实验室中,对一款双风管设置的移动空调的冷凝器左下角和右下角位置设置了喷嘴进行喷雾冷却,测试了在室外侧35 ℃/24℃(干球温度/湿球温度),室内侧27℃/19 ℃(干球温度/湿球温度)时,该移动空调系统的不同状态点温度、耗电量以及制冷量,分析了喷雾量从0.55~2.10 g/s对移动空调性能的影响规律。结果表明;随着喷雾量的增加,移动空调的蒸发压力保持1.OMPa几乎不变,而冷凝压力从3.45MPa降至3.14 MPa,冷凝温度从55.5℃降至51.3℃。同时其耗电量从l 582.95 W降低至1 46.1 W ,制冷量从3 09O W增至3 339 W,EER从1.95增至2.28。但是由于室内温度与环境温度相差仅8℃ ,冷量姗较小,系统烟效率仅为5.19%~6.08%。在各部件中,压缩机的烟损失系数最大,分别为0.496,0.472,0.479 和0.476,而蒸发器的畑效率最低,仅为24.85%~26.O0%。
关键词:  性能影响  㶲分析  喷雾冷却  移动空调
DOI:
投稿时间:2020-09-29  修订日期:2020-12-22  
基金项目:本文受河南省高等学校重点科研项目计划 (18A470019)、河南省研究生教育改革与质量提升工程项目 (YJS2021JD05)资助
Effect of Spray Amount on Spray Cooling Performance of Mobile AirConditioning Condenser
Zhang Yeqiang,Li Kangli,Jiao Xiangzhi,Hu Gen,Liu Jinping,Qin Xiaoding,Jin Tingxiang
(School of Energy and Power Engineering ,Zhengzhou University of light Industry;Guangdong Chigo AirConditioning Co.,Ltd.;School of Electric Power ,South China University of Technology)
Abstract:
In a mobile air conditioner with a double air duct, two nozzles were installed at the lower left and lower right corners of the condenser respectively, for spray cooling. With an enthalpy difference experiment, the temperature at different state points, energy consumption and refrigerating capacity were tested with outdoor temperatures of 35 ℃/24 ℃ and indoor temperatures of 27 ℃/19 ℃ (dry bulb temperature/ wet bulb temperature), and the influence of different spray quantities from 0.55 g/s to 2.10 g/s on the performance of mobile air conditioning was analyzed. The results show that with the increase in spray quantity, the evaporating pressure was almost unchanged at 1.0 MPa, but the condensing pressure decreased from 3.45 MPa to 3.14 MPa, and the condensing temperature decreased from 55.5 ℃to 51.3 ℃. Moreover, energy consumption decreased from 1582.95 W to 1465.1 W, refrigerating capacity increased from 3090 W to 3339 W, and the EER increased from 1.95 to 2.28. The cold exergy was small and the exergy efficiency of the system was only 5.19% to 6.08% because of a small difference of only 8 ℃ between the indoor and ambient temperatures. Among the different components, the maximum exergy loss coefficient occurred in the compressor, which was 0.496, 0.472, 0.479 and 0.476, respectively, while the lowest exergy efficiency was obtained in the evaporator, which was only 24.6%–26.0% .
Key words:  effect on performance  exergy  spray cooling  mobile air conditioner

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫